Teams

Nordentoft/LR/BP

2023 Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Natalie Gorman
published
3.23
Derek Nordentoft
published 3.5
2.89
Angela Antunes
published 3
Amanda Browning
published 3
Briana Crowder
published 3
2.74
Casey Lozada
published 3
2.66
Leslyn Graves
published
2.66
Camille Davis
published 3
2.55
Maddie Spickard
published
2.51
Jessica Leach
published
2.24
Hayden Finley
published 2.5
Sarah Rech
published
Yan Sun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Rech + Briana Crowder404 matchesnot enough data
Leslyn Graves + Jessica Leach033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Gorman
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Derek Nordentoft
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Angela Antunes
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Amanda Browning
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Briana Crowder
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Casey Lozada
22W–27L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Leslyn Graves
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Camille Davis
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Maddie Spickard
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Jessica Leach
14W–33L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Hayden Finley
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24
Sarah Rech
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yan Sun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.