Teams

Harlingen Gavin

2026 Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 M- 5.0 M - Spring · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-11vs Brownsville WilliamLost 02
L#2 DoublesCruz Guzman / Nicholas Houghton vs Esli Campos / Sebastian Cantu2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElijah Landeros / Matthew Torres vs Ricardo Losoya / Fernando Garcia1-6, 4-6
2026-06-02vs Harlingen JPLost 12
W#1 DoublesGavin Lerma / Ramiro Gomez vs Ryan Lerma / Ian Becker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Torres vs Gabriel Mascorro3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacob Leal / Cruz Guzman vs Juan Sauceda / Mario Castillo1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-28vs MCC - Rudy/JoshLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamiro Gomez / Gavin Lerma vs Jose Leal / Kristian Quintero6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCruz Guzman / Nicholas Houghton vs Joshua Cummings / Hugo Hinojosa6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMatthew Torres / Eddie Avitia vs Rudy Gomez / Alfonso Mora3-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs Mission EdgarLost 03
L#2 DoublesGavin Lerma / Jacob Leal vs Garrett Edwards / Cesar Ferrino3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElijah Landeros vs Miguel Gomez4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Torres / Luis Alvarez vs Efrain Guerra Lozano / Abel Cavazos2-6, 1-6
2026-04-30vs Harlingen CadeWon 30
W#1 DoublesCruz Guzman / Nicholas Houghton vs Carson Wick / Leo Cantu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGavin Lerma / Jacob Leal vs Art Teniente / Dalton Mann6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEddie Avitia / Matthew Torres vs John Kattan / JACK WICK7-6, 4-6
2026-04-23vs Mission Valley Ace InvadersLost 12
L#2 DoublesGavin Lerma / Eddie Avitia vs Tomas Aguirre / HOMERO MORENO JR4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesElijah Landeros vs Luis Escobar6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCruz Guzman / Luis Alvarez vs Manuel Soberon IV / Francisco Gonzalez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Cruz Guzman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Gavin Lerma
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Matthew Torres
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.57
Nicholas Houghton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Elijah Landeros
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Houghton + Cruz Guzman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cruz Guzman
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Gavin Lerma
8W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Matthew Torres
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Nicholas Houghton
15W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Elijah Landeros
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.