Teams

McMullen King 55

2025 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 M Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs Seminole Lake HuttonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid King / John Holland vs Brad Armagost / John Hockin5-7, 1-6
2025-03-08vs Pinellas/Buckner/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Paul Zack vs Eric Hargrave / Gvozden Dokic5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid King / Martin Black vs CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / William Arfsten4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarney Bailey / Michael Kosloske vs Jose Alomar / Sylvain Gauthier3-6, 4-6
2025-03-01vs Seminole Lake HuttonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Holland / Paul Zack vs Brian Hodapp / Chuck Goldberg7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-22vs McMullen HollingsworthSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Holland / Steven Ehrenpreis vs Daren McGovern / Michael Laccabue7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJim Stefan / Paul Zack vs Raymond Reed / Robert Sajdak5-7, 6-7
2025-02-15vs Pinellas/Buckner/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid King / Jim Stefan vs Eric Hargrave / Derek Staton6-1, 6-2
2025-02-08vs Seminole Lake HuttonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Stefan / Paul Zack vs John Hockin / Brad Armagost0-6, 5-7
2025-02-01vs McMullen HollingsworthLost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Stefan / John Holland vs Michael Laccabue / Daren McGovern3-6, 0-6
2025-01-25vs Pinellas/Buckner/55&Over8.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Zack / Jim Stefan vs Fernando Delfino / Declan Mansfield6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Paul Zack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jim Stefan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Barney Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Martin Revello
published
3.52
Darin Garner
published 4
John Holland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Martin Black
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Kosloske
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Zack
31W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Jim Stefan
37W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
John Holland
60W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin Black
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kosloske
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.