Teams

CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Groves

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-29vs CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/GilbertWon 10
W#3 DoublesNadine Kim / Jill Elsa Crichton vs Janice Campbell / Suzanne Young5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Elsa Crichton / Nadine Kim vs Molly Woods / Jeanie Alhadeff6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTerri Johnson / Nadine Kim vs Paula Buononato / Celeste Armitage6-4, 6-1
2021-03-08vs CV-Palm Desert Resort/L PriceWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Wolfe / Jill Delaney vs Sharon Weinberg / Mistie Iseman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerri Johnson / Nadine Kim vs Jo-ann Champagne / Rhonda Budlong-Reints6-2, 6-2
2021-03-01vs CV-Sun Lakes/M WalterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTerri Johnson / Nadine Kim vs Tammy Pronenko / Catherine Leogrande2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Laura Emerson / Lori Hazelton6-0, 6-3
2021-02-22vs CV-Desert Princess/Pat BaughmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerri Johnson / Nadine Kim vs Sanae Chance / Patricia Baughman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Wolfe / Jill Delaney vs Karen Meyer / Laura Susskind2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jill Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Nadine Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Terri Johnson
published
Mona Klimmek
published
Patti Groves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Kim + Jill Delaney6164% gamesnot enough data
Nadine Kim + Patti Groves303 matchesnot enough data
Jill Delaney + Patti Groves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
Nadine Kim
90W–96L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
Mona Klimmek
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patti Groves
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.