Teams

Seminole Lake Dsa 3.0 W

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-14vs Countryside OverservedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGladys Nunamaker vs Maresol Wehner0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIsabelle Blainey / Emily Corbett vs Melissa Weible / Frances Skinner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Pinellas/Bryan/40&Over3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Corbett / Celeste Rekieta vs Patricia Aliak / Patricia Smith6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesInna Rand / Jennifer Anderson vs Melissa Bryan / Veronica Sullivan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Spravaka / Marianne Banales vs Pamela Couchenour / Holly Richardson4-6, 1-6
2025-04-12vs Seminole Lake Jordan OverservedLost 13
L#1 DoublesInna Rand / Jessica Spravaka vs Elizabeth Jordan / Valeska Dykes0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Corbett vs Amonrut Jaimoon0-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesHong Liu / Wei Xue vs Patty Anderson / Paula Eurich6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarianne Banales / Urmila Wadnerkar vs Debi Billington / Asheley Wardell0-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs RCSP SchwerinLost 02
L#1 DoublesInna Rand / Jessica Spravaka vs Zhanna Thomas / Susan Barham5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGladys Nunamaker / Marianne Banales vs Connie Yilmaz / Nancy Saari3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Jose Dsa
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Wei Xue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Carrie Stiers
published 3
2.79
Hong Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Emily Corbett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Celeste Rekieta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gladys Nunamaker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Inna Rand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Isabelle Blainey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Spravaka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marianne Banales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Spravaka + Inna Rand1535% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jose Dsa
121W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Carrie Stiers
71W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Hong Liu
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Emily Corbett
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Celeste Rekieta
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Gladys Nunamaker
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Inna Rand
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Isabelle Blainey
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Spravaka
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Banales
7W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.