Teams

Kristen Anderson W7.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 7.5

9 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-23vs Blaine Eschenburg W7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesWendi Kaplan / Rochelle Watson vs Maria McGee / Heidi Moore6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Schreyer / Halie Overton vs Blaine Eschenburg / Heather Perkins4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Donohoe / Erika Burton vs Denelle Alexander / Stephanie Barna6-4, 7-6
2025-08-23vs Tricia Roos W7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Anderson / Katherine Ratliff vs Lisa Nammari / Emily Suter6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMolly Carson / Wendi Kaplan vs Shannon Hogan / Brenda Talavera2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Donohoe / Emily Seifert vs Sarah Sparling / Jennifer Shuff6-1, 6-0
2025-08-22vs Abby Thompson W7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Schreyer / Halie Overton vs Abby Thompson / Sara Wadlington6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Seifert / Kristen Anderson vs Taylor Hutsell / Graceann Devlieger6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Carson / Rochelle Watson vs Sheri Colaluca / Lisa Thomas7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Lisa Donohoe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Erin Schreyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Wendi Kaplan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Halie Overton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Katherine Ratliff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Seifert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Erika Burton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Carson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rochelle Watson + Halie Overton5062% games+10.8% vs expected
Wendi Kaplan + Lisa Donohoe13456% games+5.2% vs expected
Rochelle Watson + Emily Seifert4155% gamesnot enough data
Rochelle Watson + Molly Carson4163% gamesnot enough data
Emily Seifert + Lisa Donohoe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Donohoe
35W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Rochelle Watson
32W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Erin Schreyer
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Wendi Kaplan
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Halie Overton
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Katherine Ratliff
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Emily Seifert
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erika Burton
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Carson
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.