Teams

Philley/Gadek- Hollytree

2025 NETX Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs Sherrell - FaulknerWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Jeffress / Rebekah Singleton vs Hannah Estes / Aimee Krog6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Gadek vs Alisa Simmons6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Clark / Mary Duke vs Lisa Losack / Jaclyn Sherrell0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCelina Johnson / Martha Schulz vs Melinda Ross / Penny Spellman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-03vs Sherrell - FaulknerLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelli Cromer / Jennifer Jeffress vs Shera-Donne Lee / Alisa Simmons5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCelina Johnson vs Jill Hamil5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Duke / Amy Johnston vs Lisa Losack / Jaclyn Sherrell1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Quevedo / Laura LaToof vs Melinda Ross / Penny Spellman1-6, 3-6
2025-02-24vs Caswell/Hinshaw-Longview High SchoolSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gadek / Sharon Wynne vs Amelia Maxwell / Toni Sharp6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKelli Cromer vs Julie Caswell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jeffress / Heather Hill vs Cara Jordan / Debbie Conner0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Schulz / Nancy Lowrance vs Charlotte Jackson / Ashleigh Buchanan0-6, 5-7
2025-02-10vs Sherrell - FaulknerLost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Gadek / Celina Johnson vs Alisa Simmons / Shera-Donne Lee3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLeah Philley vs Jill Hamil6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Hill / Laura LaToof vs Hannah Estes / Aimee Krog3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Johnston / Mary Duke vs Jennifer Johnston / Melinda Ross1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLeah Philley / Jennifer Gadek vs Julie Caswell / Heather Surholt5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCelina Johnson vs Ashleigh Buchanan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah Singleton / Jennifer Jeffress vs Toni Sharp / Amelia Maxwell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Tauscher / Kelli Cromer vs Kathy Huffstuttler / Cara Jordan6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSharon Wynne / Diane Tauscher vs Heather Surholt / Amelia Maxwell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCelina Johnson vs Ashleigh Buchanan6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRebekah Singleton / Jennifer Jeffress vs Julie Caswell / Cara Jordan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Clark / Nancy Lowrance vs Clara Ross / Amy Kennedy4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Rebekah Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Jennifer Gadek
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.95
Kelli Cromer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Leah Philley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.74
Martha Schulz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Sharon Wynne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Jennifer Jeffress
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Diane Tauscher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.56
Celina Johnson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.52
Nancy Lowrance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dawn Clark
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura LaToof
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Duke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Wynne + Jennifer Gadek5357% games+5.8% vs expected
Kelli Cromer + Jennifer Jeffress033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Jeffress + Rebekah Singleton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebekah Singleton
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Jennifer Gadek
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kelli Cromer
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Leah Philley
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Martha Schulz
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Sharon Wynne
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Jennifer Jeffress
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Diane Tauscher
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Celina Johnson
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Nancy Lowrance
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Dawn Clark
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura LaToof
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Duke
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.