Teams

MFiddes (Raintree)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesMark Fiddes vs Hani Mahgoub2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJohn Causey vs Tim Rodriguez6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-06vs LEvansek (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJosh Wolff vs Ganesh Pallem1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMichael Fresina vs Rishi Gogate6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrian Austin vs Michel Abranches1-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs CRabidou (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 SinglesMark Fiddes vs Mark Krasniewski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Causey vs Scott Hansen7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMichael Fresina vs Christopher Rabidou1-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJosh Wolff vs Burns McGarry7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Causey vs Sarat Mishra2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Fresina vs Tommy Cary6-3, 7-5
2026-06-15vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJohn Causey vs Kent Franks2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesVikram Datta vs Rod Wilkes2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMark Fiddes vs Alan Roll6-2, 6-2
2026-06-09vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesVikram Datta vs Patrick Blandford5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMark Fiddes vs Heyward Bouknight2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJohn Causey vs Bill Helman6-1, 6-2
2026-06-08vs EOBrien (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesMark Fiddes vs Vladislav Valtsis6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrian Austin vs Jaiganesh Rajamanickam2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesVikram Datta vs Joseph Dichak6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KFranks (PPRSC)34101124193
2DBarden (Mountainbrook)3481326197
3EOBrien (WSRC)3491227198
4MFiddes (Raintree)2581328204
5HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)1631837238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Josh Wolff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Mark Fiddes
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.19
John Causey
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.18
Vikram Datta
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Michael Fresina
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Brian Austin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Wolff
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Mark Fiddes
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
John Causey
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Vikram Datta
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Michael Fresina
39W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Brian Austin
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.