Teams

Weaver OSTC

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over-GC · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Holly Bourgeois
published
2.98
Julia Weaver
published
2.95
Betty Burns
published 3
2.62
Monique Farrington
published
2.44
Heather Wagner
published
Terri Jordan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Weaver + Terri Jordan4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Bourgeois
17W–19L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Julia Weaver
16W–20L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Celeste Bontemps-Geiser
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Betty Burns
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monique Farrington
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.62
Heather Wagner
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.44
Terri Jordan
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.