Teams

Ltc - Levine

2022 Broward Adult 40 & Over Day · 4.0 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-17vs Broward/Veltri - KoonWon 31
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Julianna Dudics2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Loren Levine vs Joan S Oelschlager / Margaret MacHoian6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesYonghong Chen / Bea Tully vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesRaegan Hanson / Frances Cubano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-03vs Broward/Veltri - KoonLost 23
W#1 DoublesMichele King / Loren Levine vs Vladlena Funk / Ivy Touchstone6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMyra Perkins vs Suzanne Siegler6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Moreno / Svetlana Janglin vs Ina Gluck / Maria Montoto2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBea Tully / Yonghong Chen vs Gloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesConnie Rivera / Raegan Hanson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-24vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasLost 12
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Janglin vs Rosana Renzi2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBea Tully / Raegan Hanson vs Sigal Sasson / Cheryl Bonno6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Rivera / Loren Levine vs Rosana Fernandez / Garbine de la Mora4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-10vs Broward/Veltri - KoonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoren Levine / Connie Rivera vs Gloria Coursey / Clarena Furtado3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA vs Suzanne Siegler6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Weiss / Bea Tully vs Ina Gluck / Maria Montoto2-6, 0-6
2022-02-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesSahar Moghaddam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-20vs Broward/Veltri - KoonLost 03
L#2 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Sandra Bazain vs Clarena Furtado / Gloria Coursey5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLoren Levine / Frances Cubano vs Lorena Villar / Ivy Touchstone4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesConnie Rivera / Bea Tully vs Maria Montoto / Ina Gluck1-6, 0-6
2022-01-13vs Veltri - Gonzalez/ContrerasWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Moreno / Sahar Moghaddam vs Taciana Kalili / Natalia Frantsevskaya6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichele King / Bea Tully vs Ana Carolina Manchester / Garbine de la Mora2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#4 DoublesJeanne Wickwire / Lori Kaplan vs Rossana OKAMURA / Zorayda Hidalgo6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Laurie Mathews
published
4.03
Michele King
published
4.00
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Edith Schmidt
published 4
3.89
Lori Kaplan
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Loren Levine
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Sandra Bazain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
3.61
Maria Moreno
published
3.59
Prin Vasseur
published 4
3.50
Bea Tully
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Myra Perkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Raegan Hanson
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Frances Cubano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Elisabeth Weiss
published 3.5
Jeanne Wickwire
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frances Cubano + NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA4353% games−1.6% vs expected
Loren Levine + Edith Schmidt6357% games−3.2% vs expected
Frances Cubano + Loren Levine121949% games−7.2% vs expected
Sahar Moghaddam + Loren Levine11168% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Bazain + NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA2357% gamesnot enough data
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA + Loren Levine314 matchesnot enough data
Frances Cubano + Sandra Bazain123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Kaplan + Loren Levine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Mathews
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Sahar Moghaddam
280W–189L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Edith Schmidt
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Lori Kaplan
139W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
147W–107L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Sandra Bazain
243W–156L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
ELIZABETH GORDILLO
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Maria Moreno
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Prin Vasseur
126W–155L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Bea Tully
30W–93L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Myra Perkins
24W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Raegan Hanson
87W–55L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Frances Cubano
165W–212L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elisabeth Weiss
31W–75L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Jeanne Wickwire
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.