Teams

CMarko (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Combo 7.5 Women - Fri AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-28vs SLowrance/ALacarter (Russell)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Pasut / Diana Gasparro vs Ann Richards / Donna Buchman6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChris Marko / Karen Foster vs Ann Lacarter / Anita Dowker2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-21vs DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCyndie Hobson / Lisa Wilson vs Lisa Riggins / Sharon Wooten0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Cranford / Marla Horvath vs Shirley Stoltenberg / Deborah Toomey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Northrup / Holly Pasut vs Rosemary Hill / Lu Ann Burke2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 65 & Over Combo 7.5 Women - Fri AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CMarko (WSRC)000000
2DCarmazzi (Charlotte Tennis)000000
3LCunningham (Palisades)000000
4SLowrance/ALacarter (Russell)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Barbara Northrup
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Cranford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Diana Gasparro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Cyndie Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Chris Marko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Dorothy Senay
published
3.21
Holly Pasut
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kathy King
published
3.11
Shay Hartley
published 3.5
3.07
Marla Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Sally Dickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndie Hobson + Chris Marko14457% games−9.2% vs expected
Cyndie Hobson + Barbara Northrup7357% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Northrup + Chris Marko6454% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Cranford + Chris Marko2444% gamesnot enough data
Cyndie Hobson + Sharon Cranford3245% gamesnot enough data
Marla Horvath + Shay Hartley134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Cranford + Diana Gasparro123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Northrup + Diana Gasparro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Northrup
138W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Sharon Cranford
79W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Diana Gasparro
63W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Cyndie Hobson
219W–123L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Chris Marko
82W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Dorothy Senay
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Holly Pasut
32W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kathy King
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Shay Hartley
36W–44L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Marla Horvath
61W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Sally Dickson
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.