Teams

KMacrone (Ballantyne Country Club)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs JCarney (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Natalie Corrigan vs Mindy Zimmerman / Marisa Haehnlein0-6, 1-6
2022-04-26vs MJessee/JBarton (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Harriet Hoonjan vs Paulina Coello / Monica Larios1-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs SChandler (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Jami Stone vs Paula Abrams / Rona Karacaova2-6, 2-6
2022-04-18vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel CC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Shelton / Jami Stone vs Julia Hartley / Maria Sevigny3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMelodie Ohaus vs Laurie Diman3-6, 2-6
2022-04-12vs FHaselden (Palisades CC)Split 11
W#1 SinglesMelodie Ohaus vs Teri McConahie6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGolin Kosowitz / Jami Stone vs Patricia Chitwood / Angela Majewski0-6, 1-6
2022-03-29vs MTurturro (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Melodie Ohaus vs Eileen Jones / Mary Turturro6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Couchenour / Jami Stone vs Caroleen Towery / Judy DiLiddo3-6, 3-6
2022-03-15vs SHerndon (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate MacRone / Jami Stone vs Gina Gilchrist / Sandra Torres0-6, 0-6
2022-03-01vs KLee (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Sanniota / Melodie Ohaus vs Katie Archer / Mayela Magur0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Golin Kosowitz vs Jane Moncayo / Jeannine Mortenson1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jami Stone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
Natalie Corrigan
published
2.48
Vonda Huss
published
2.41
Ellen McKane
published 2.5
2.38
Linda Shelton
published
Golin Kosowitz
published 2.5
Carrie Baker
published
Rachel Couchenour
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen McKane + Natalie Corrigan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jami Stone
97W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Natalie Corrigan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
Vonda Huss
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Ellen McKane
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%76%24%
2.41
Linda Shelton
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.38
2.5
Golin Kosowitz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Carrie Baker
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Couchenour
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.