Teams

Janiszewski/META

2024 Combo 18 & over-META · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kim Ewing
published
3.51
Holli Cox
published
3.19
Eve Little Bradford
published
3.18
Brittini Thacker
published 3.5
3.17
Sarah LaGuardia
published
3.16
Lynne Little
published
2.96
Raegan Goodson
published
2.78
Anneke Self
published 3
2.70
Kari Holt
published
2.65
2.60
Barb Janiszewski
published 3
Laura Reeves
published
Rachel Lovelace
published
Ruth Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Little + Eve Little Bradford9170% games+14.1% vs expected
Lynne Little + Sarah LaGuardia224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Lovelace + Ashley Youngblood123 matchesnot enough data
Anneke Self + Holli Cox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Ewing
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Holli Cox
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Eve Little Bradford
25W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Brittini Thacker
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Sarah LaGuardia
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Lynne Little
31W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
Raegan Goodson
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Anneke Self
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Kari Holt
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Ashley Youngblood
5W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Barb Janiszewski
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.60
Laura Reeves
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Lovelace
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruth Jackson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.