Teams

Edge Plus

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-28vs Chicks with SticksLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Levis / Kim Barrow vs Jody Amann / Desiree Nichtula7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-21vs Love All 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKim Barrow / Denise Levis vs Meaghan Curry / Carrie Wofford2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Sandy Schefkind vs Penelope Bell / Tamar Henkin7-6, 4-2
2024-03-07vs Anything But NetWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Amy McDonald vs Annie Carey / Elizabeth Levy7-5, 6-3
2024-02-29vs FunTennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Elizabeth Brody vs Julie McConnell / Veronique Kessler6-2, 6-3
2024-02-08vs Maryland MadnessWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy McDonald / Karyn Ialeggio vs Joan-Marie Turchiano / Galina Orlova6-4, 6-2
2024-01-22vs Smart AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Atkinson / Denise Levis vs Maria Elena Greene / Julia Saperstein7-6, 2-3
W#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Paula Pels vs Margaret Maloney / Camille Flint6-0, 6-0
2024-01-18vs Arlington CrushersWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Levis / Kim Barrow vs Sarah Trimmer / Katherine Pinho5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-10vs Aspen Hill Hot ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy McDonald / Karyn Ialeggio vs Mary Stafford / JULIENNE EBONGUE6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kim Atkinson
published
3.47
Karyn Ialeggio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Denise Levis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Amy McDonald
published 3.5
Elizabeth Brody
published 3.5
3.14
Victoria Quint
published
3.06
Lauren Richardson
published
2.94
Paula Pels
published
2.87
Kimberly Goldsteen
published
Sandy Schefkind
published
Stacey Kohl
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Atkinson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Karyn Ialeggio
45W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Denise Levis
131W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy McDonald
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Brody
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Quint
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lauren Richardson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
3.06
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Kimberly Goldsteen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.87
Sandy Schefkind
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Kohl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.