Teams

CALIFORNIA TC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesGwendolyn Holcombe / Olivia Morgan vs Sally Brien / Lois Anne Indorf6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Swain / Mary Rose Fernandez vs Karen Brandman / Laura Kelly2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrea Barrett / Patricia Sheedy vs Michelle Philpot / Amy Kleckner6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLisa Gumpert / Ginny Conner vs Laura Kelly / Daphne Zenk6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatrina Jessoe / Andrea Barrett vs Lilian Kim / Karen Forsthoff6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEllen Cowan / Jennifer Orser vs Paula Mangin / Kristen Steck6-0, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Katrina Jessoe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Kelly Stiles
published
3.74
Ally Gwozdz
published 4
3.70
Gwendolyn Holcombe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Laura Spivy
published
3.66
Anna Morfit
published 4
3.66
Lara Witter
published
3.65
Ginny Conner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Evelyn Armstrong
published
3.62
Marjorie Swain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Tina Skouras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Patricia Sheedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Lisa Gumpert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Olivia Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jane von Bothmer
published
3.31
Jessica Eisler
published
3.28
Ellen Cowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Shilpa Jain
published
3.24
Sally Fay
published
3.21
Andrea Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Mary Rose Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jennifer Orser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lida Treadwell
published
3.06
Lizanne Suter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginny Conner + Kelly Stiles5258% games+11.5% vs expected
Evelyn Armstrong + Kelly Stiles134 matchesnot enough data
Shilpa Jain + Patricia Sheedy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katrina Jessoe
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Kelly Stiles
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Ally Gwozdz
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Gwendolyn Holcombe
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Laura Spivy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Anna Morfit
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Lara Witter
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Ginny Conner
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Evelyn Armstrong
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Marjorie Swain
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Patricia Sheedy
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lisa Gumpert
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Olivia Morgan
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jane von Bothmer
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jessica Eisler
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Ellen Cowan
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Shilpa Jain
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sally Fay
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Andrea Barrett
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Mary Rose Fernandez
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Jennifer Orser
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Lida Treadwell
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Lizanne Suter
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.