Teams

Arbor Greene Miss Hits - C. VanMeter

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-22vs Hills - FH Sweetspots/C. DemingLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Melissa Kandell vs Catherine Davidson / Carrie Deming2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Gaier vs Carly Day3-6, 3-6
2021-02-22vs FH Moodswings - C. GuidoLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Denys Hubbard vs Evonski Lennear / Stephane Duroseau0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / AMY ISAAC vs Angie Jones / Lisa Polk1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesSandra Bell / Rebecca Gaier vs Jolanta Lagowski / Mary Myers6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs Matura Suksai1-6, 2-6
2021-01-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Gaier vs Sandra Fowler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-01-11vs Cheval - B. BurdetteSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gaier / Melissa Kandell vs Vera Trayner / Jacqueline Hayes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDenys Hubbard vs Lorrie White3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
AMY ISAAC
published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Gaier
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
2.97
Jiyoung Yoon
published
2.90
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.75
Denys Hubbard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Sandra Bell
published
2.63
Amy Butts
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denys Hubbard + Rebecca Gaier11554% games−0.3% vs expected
Rebecca Gaier + AMY ISAAC121055% gamesnot enough data
Denys Hubbard + AMY ISAAC5060% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Coffey + Jiyoung Yoon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMY ISAAC
107W–59L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 7 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jiyoung Yoon
11W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Denys Hubbard
126W–90L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Sandra Bell
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.