Teams

LLTC - Open

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Thursday Men's Doubles · Open Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-06vs LLTC - Spice PandasWon 30
W#1 DoublesFernando Arguello / Michael Smith vs Hung Choe / Ruben Vargas7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJ Thomas Hannah / Frederick Albion vs Vince Nguyen / Peter Nguyen6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Geisel / Ross Gehlhausen vs Edward Gonzales / Chris Light6-3, 6-2
2025-10-30vs Cinco Ranch West - SlammersWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrederick Albion / Ross Gehlhausen vs Nathaniel Kipping / Trevor Kipping6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKenneth Nguyen / Fernando Arguello vs Leland Rolling / David Hoffman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNicholas Butler / Matthew Geisel vs Ramkumar Aduru / Steven Griffith6-2
2025-10-23vs Lifetime GalleriaWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichael Smith / Frederick Albion vs Dimitri Ang / Bharath Raj7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIgnacio Rivero Crespo / Nicholas Butler vs Archibald Gwathmey Jr / Nathan Mortel7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKenneth Nguyen / Fernando Arguello vs Cameron Klement / Mihir Nadig6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesJ Thomas Hannah / Matthew Geisel vs Kevin Ting / Ramiro Trevizo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Country Village - Old SchoolWon 31
W#1 DoublesRoss Gehlhausen / Michael Smith vs Ryan Cooper / Neil Carpenter6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJose Antelo / Fernando Arguello vs Phi Huynh / Jeffrey Jordan6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJarod Jahns / Matthew Geisel vs Bjoern Steckel / Adrian Melchor3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesNicholas Butler / Kenneth Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-02vs LLTC - Spice PandasWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrederick Albion / Andrew Zhang vs Ruben Vargas / Vince Nguyen6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJose Antelo / Ignacio Rivero Crespo vs Huy Nguyen / Peter Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFernando Arguello / J Thomas Hannah vs Clement Vo / Edward Gonzales6-1, 6-2
2025-09-25vs Cinco Ranch West - SlammersWon 31
W#1 DoublesJose Antelo / Ross Gehlhausen vs Thaddeus Holloway / Trevor Kipping6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Zhang / Kenneth Nguyen vs Leland Rolling / Albert Piasecki3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFrederick Albion / Jarod Jahns vs Tim Rogers / Ramkumar Aduru6-1, 6-3
W#4 DoublesNicholas Butler / Matthew Geisel vs Lee Henley / Warren Miller6-3, 6-2
2025-09-18vs Lifetime GalleriaWon 40
W#1 DoublesFrederick Albion / Ignacio Rivero Crespo vs Bharath Raj / Christopher Sioco1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJose Antelo / Ross Gehlhausen vs Archibald Gwathmey Jr / Andrew McKinnon7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFernando Arguello / Andrew Zhang vs Dimitri Ang / Mihir Nadig6-4, 6-3
W#4 DoublesNicholas Butler / Jarod Jahns vs Nathan Mortel / Cameron Klement6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Open Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Open0723513178
2LLTC - Spice Pandas0892349309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.04
Ignacio Rivero Crespo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5.5
4.78
Jose Antelo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.75
Ross Gehlhausen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.70
Frederick Albion
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.70
J Thomas Hannah
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.67
Jarod Jahns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
4.59
Matthew Geisel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
4.54
Fernando Arguello
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Andrew Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Michael Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Butler
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicholas Butler + Ross Gehlhausen123 matchesnot enough data
Jose Antelo + Frederick Albion303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Ignacio Rivero Crespo
5W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
5.04
Jose Antelo
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.78
Ross Gehlhausen
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.75
5
Frederick Albion
27W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.70
4.5
J Thomas Hannah
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.70
Jarod Jahns
17W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.67
Matthew Geisel
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.59
4.5
Fernando Arguello
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.54
5
Andrew Zhang
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
4.40
Michael Smith
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Butler
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.