← Teams

VTC-Olson 7.0

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.62
Kevin Muck
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.29
Pete Kovalenko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Bob Towne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Joselito Navales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Wei Pan
published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Maryann Velez
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
—
Ben Yamaguchi
published 3
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Olson / Nenette Olson vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Steve Harris3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBob Towne / Rochelle Pluymers vs Blythe Knott / Paul Laurent4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJoselito Navales / Maryann Velez vs Annie Sumpter / Marcelo Diversi6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBen Yamaguchi / Yumiko Pike vs Mister Archedon / Lynne Nieda2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKevin Muck / Robin Burak vs Karen Dellinger / Jim Mounts6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBob Towne / Michele Beaman vs Cheryl Roloff / David Williams7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Janet Mills vs Jan Funkhouser / Clay Funkhouser5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-14Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRobin Burak / Kevin Muck vs Judith Kobin / Scott Dickinson6-2, 6-2
2024-04-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Ben Yamaguchi vs Barbara Gram / Chresten Gram7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaryann Velez / Joselito Navales vs Lisa Hockman / James Takahashi6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Beaman / Pete Kovalenko vs Thu Johnson / Bill Henderson7-6, 6-2
2024-04-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJanet Mills / Pete Kovalenko vs Dianna Kaady / Steve Swan6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Ben Yamaguchi vs Nicola Ash / Lawrence Cooper6-1, 7-6
2024-03-30Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Mary Lowblad / Bill Lowblad6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Burak / Kevin Muck vs Ann Kitchen / Octavian Tudorache6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBob Towne / Michele Beaman vs Suzanne Friedman / Tony Moreno4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-03-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPete Kovalenko / Rochelle Pluymers vs Craig Mills / Christine Taylor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoselito Navales / Maryann Velez vs David Lee / Karla Hendrickson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Liu / Janet Mills vs Gary McKenzie / Denise Angel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Kevin Muck
64W–90L career
9%91%0%
3.62
3.5
Pete Kovalenko
24W–28L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Bob Towne
17W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Joselito Navales
19W–22L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Wei Pan
18W–23L career · type M
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Maryann Velez
81W–49L career
0%83%17%
2.99
3
Ben Yamaguchi
16W–16L career · type M
not enough data
—
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.