← Teams

MAC-Lochner

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Julie Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Lisa Howlett
published 3.5
3.25
Diane Malhotra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristin Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Nicolle Lochner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Kathleen Cooney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Wendy Hill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-11-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Kathleen Cooney vs Rochelle Pluymers / Nenette Olson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson vs Louanne Fuller / Nancy Duncan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Noonan / Wendy Hill vs Karen Gee / Robin Burak6-3, 6-4
2021-10-31Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKristin Campbell / Nicolle Lochner vs Donna Kennish / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Hill / Dana Petrusich vs Sandi Martes / Kathy Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson vs Hideko Kershaw / Anne Vanderlinden4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-29Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Julie Kim vs Paula Watt / Barbara Griffin6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Sarah Robertson vs Janet Collier / Katherine Farrell6-1, 6-3
2021-10-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Diane Malhotra vs Michele Waite / Judith Brauer6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Julie Kim vs Shirley Derby / Julie Arness6-4, 6-4
2021-10-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJaymi Sladen / Sarah Robertson vs Nancy Atkins / Karen Harris7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Hill / Julie Noonan vs Karen Groenweghe / Patricia Sturr6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Diane Malhotra vs Kathi Gray / Patty Meighen6-4, 7-5
2021-10-10Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Nicolle Lochner vs Donna Kennish / Cynthia Ross-Brockett4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Julie Noonan vs Sandi Martes / Kathy Johnson6-1, 6-2
2021-09-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJulie Kim / Kathleen Cooney vs Sue Edmonds / Robin Burak6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Campbell / Nicolle Lochner vs Patti Dybdahl / Lynn Hendrix6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Mary Erzen vs Louanne Fuller / Patricia Nierenberg6-2, 6-3
2021-09-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Christian Buchholz vs Traina Giles / Jodee Midura6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJaymi Sladen / Sarah Robertson vs Colleen Hamilton / Karen Harris6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Hill / Nicolle Lochner vs Kathi Gray / Janet Hostetler6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Julie Kim
49W–37L career · type A
61%39%0%
3.39
3.5
Lisa Howlett
31W–21L career · type S
6%91%4%
3.26
3.5
Diane Malhotra
46W–26L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Kristin Campbell
32W–52L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Nicolle Lochner
36W–73L career
25%74%1%
3.09
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07
3.5
Kathleen Cooney
47W–71L career
31%69%0%
3.01
3
Wendy Hill
34W–48L career
0%96%3%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.