Teams

Fiddlers Creek - Keely

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-20vs COLLIER/Mintz/Combo50&over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Ray / Robert Jewett vs Gerard Benner / Ben Yocom6-7, 3-6
2025-05-13vs Village Walk Bonita - Van AlstineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Cohen / Mark Garrett vs Chad McAlpin / Randolph van Alstine6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStan Britton / M Ross Fisher vs Len Forner / Paul Michaels3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Naples Grande - CarranLost 02
L#1 DoublesWayne Erne / Mark Garrett vs Kevin O'Brien / Lewis Carran1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEd Coringrato / Robert Jewett vs Mark Greenaway / Richard Lewis3-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs Cambier / PackoLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Jewett / Zaheer Karim M D vs David Murray / David Packo6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-15vs COLLIER/Mintz/Combo50&over7.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesWayne Erne / M Ross Fisher vs Rob Fox / Marco Arilli3-6, 2-6
2025-03-25vs Cambier / PackoLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Keely / Wayne Erne vs John Franta / Jeffrey Saviano4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & over Men Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
David Keely
published 3.5
3.52
Joseph Kardek
published
Ed Coringrato
published
James Ray
published
Jeffrey Bergman
published
Mark Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Jewett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Britton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Wayne Erne
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Jewett + Ed Coringrato213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Ed Coringrato
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Ray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Bergman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Garrett
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Jewett
105W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stan Britton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steven Cohen
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Erne
88W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.