Teams

Refund/Transfer

2025 18&Over Women · Holding

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Holding have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Elizabeth Miller
published 4
3.30
Christina Bohn
published 3.5
3.02
RANEE KUMAR
published 3
2.39
Armida Tarquinio
published 2.5
2.26
Lisa Kureczka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Sharon Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Charlene Fruda
published
Pamela Barnes
published
Vanessa Ferreira
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Miller
44W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Christina Bohn
188W–147L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3
RANEE KUMAR
43W–103L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
2.5
Armida Tarquinio
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
Lisa Kureczka
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Sharon Jones
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Charlene Fruda
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Barnes
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Ferreira
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.