Teams

TCSP-Lob-sters-Othman

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.78 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-28vs TCSP-Aces-O'ConnorWon 30
W#1 DoublesKAYOKO SHIBUE / Mary Elliott vs Michiko Kono / Saadia Pekkanen7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAndrea Haines vs Meghan Silver6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAngela Arralde / Kate Goodman vs Tamar Blau / Kris Morones6-1, 6-2
2025-02-21vs NWW-ETC-BoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Haines / Mary Elliott vs Christina Ntouniaoglou / Karen Ng6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKAYOKO SHIBUE vs Olga Moshchuk3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarrie Priebe / Kate Goodman vs Cindy Quitasol / Carrie Toppano6-1, 6-2
2025-02-16vs CP-Fun-Makers-ChoiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Elliott / KAYOKO SHIBUE vs Ashleigh Walls / Ge Wang0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Othman / Kay Takano vs Larisa Kaukonen / YUN LIU6-4, 6-0
2025-02-01vs NWW-BTA-HuangLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Othman / KAYOKO SHIBUE vs Qiong Fei / Anuradha Nandagiri7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHillary Higgins vs Maryna Kosau2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelinda Roberts / Kay Takano vs Porsha Kahlon / Hui Xu4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-25vs HBSQ-YeighWon 21
L#1 DoublesKay Takano / Stephanie Axelrod vs Terri Hix / Vanessa Stedman3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAngela Arralde vs Melissa Jamison6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHillary Higgins / Carrie Priebe vs Jia Tang / Leslie Boyd6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-19vs FC-MartinLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Othman / Rachel Lynette vs Rachel Martin / Liz Sheffield7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKay Takano vs Renee Pitra1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Axelrod / Melinda Roberts vs Naomi Mora / Olga McGhee4-6, 0-6
2025-01-11vs TCSP-SpainWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Arralde / Andrea Haines vs Anne Manicone / Suzanne Kalberer6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachel Lynette vs Jenny Ott7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKate Goodman / Melinda Roberts vs Rhenda Meiser / Julia Sommerfeld4-6, 2-6
2025-01-03vs PL-Strings Attached-LogueSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Othman / Rachel Lynette vs Elisha Logue / Meng Yang6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHillary Higgins / Kay Takano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-Box 2.5W7119513147
2NWW-BTA-Huang7118615153
3BAIN-Carrillo7118617158
4FC-Martin6217718160
5PL-Strings Attached-Logue6215922209
6RBW-Racket Rebels-Farag44121224192
7TCSP-Lob-sters-Othman44131125212
8EDG-Solie44131127204
9TCSP-40 Love-Carlson44111329241
10BC-Sets in the City-Strelow44101429224
11CP-Fun-Makers-Choi44101429224
12TCSP-Davis2691533223
13CAC/SL-Bet On Our Court2681634246
14ETC-Onu2681636245
15TCSP-Aces-O'Connor1751938253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Andrea Haines
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Diane Othman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Hillary Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.57
KAYOKO SHIBUE
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.54
Carrie Priebe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.53
Angela Arralde
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.43
Kay Takano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.40
Kate Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Rachel Lynette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Sarah Blake
published
Melinda Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Axelrod
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Goodman + Carrie Priebe6166% games+13.7% vs expected
Diane Othman + Carrie Priebe4253% games+6.0% vs expected
Hillary Higgins + Andrea Haines8252% games+5.2% vs expected
Rachel Lynette + Diane Othman224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Othman + Kay Takano224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Haines
24W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Diane Othman
15W–16L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
3
Hillary Higgins
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
KAYOKO SHIBUE
35W–56L career · 7 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Carrie Priebe
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Angela Arralde
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Kay Takano
19W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Kate Goodman
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Rachel Lynette
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Sarah Blake
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Melinda Roberts
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Axelrod
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.