Teams

Harwood

2023 Adult 55 & Over- NAZ · NAZ 8.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-23vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeanne Mariano / Pam DEDINSKY vs Debbi Cassidy / Sarah Bartling6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Mourtsen / Jana Perpich vs Doreen McCabe / Jenny Douglas6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnn Harwood / Allison Bates vs Diane Brock / Francine Hackerott3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-25vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Crownhart / Pam DEDINSKY vs Jade LeWin / Francine Hackerott7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnn Harwood / Leanne Mariano vs Jenny Douglas / Becky Williams1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Bates / Tracy Schweitzer vs Sarah Bartling / Debbi Cassidy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-25vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeanne Mariano / Jennifer Crownhart vs Jade LeWin / Becky Williams3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Mourtsen / Jana Perpich vs Jenny Douglas / Sarah Bartling4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPam DEDINSKY / Molly Palley vs Doreen McCabe / Diane Brock6-4, 6-2
2023-05-14vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Palley / Leanne Mariano vs Jenny Douglas / Becky Williams2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Schweitzer / Jana Perpich vs Diane Brock / Debbi Cassidy5-7, 6-7
2023-05-07vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Matthews / Esther Spravzoff vs Francine Hackerott / Jenny Douglas6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHelen McCallum / Gwen Schulz vs Debbi Cassidy / Sarah Bartling6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Bates / Tracy Schweitzer vs Doreen McCabe / Diane Brock6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-07vs NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesEsther Spravzoff / Helen McCallum vs Francine Hackerott / Jenny Douglas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGwen Schulz / Leanne Mariano vs Debbi Cassidy / Sarah Bartling2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Bates / Jana Perpich vs Doreen McCabe / Diane Brock6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NAZ 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Hackerott/55 and over/ 8.0W4210820160
2Harwood2481023174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jennifer Crownhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Esther Spravzoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Allison Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Helen McCallum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Lynn Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Gwen Schulz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Leanne Mariano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Ann Harwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Debra Mourtsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jana Perpich
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Molly Palley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pam DEDINSKY
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Schweitzer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen McCallum + Esther Spravzoff6556% games+13.0% vs expected
Jennifer Crownhart + Esther Spravzoff10067% games+10.6% vs expected
Ann Harwood + Jennifer Crownhart6451% games+6.6% vs expected
Jana Perpich + Tracy Schweitzer2345% games+2.4% vs expected
Gwen Schulz + Leanne Mariano8848% games+1.6% vs expected
Lynn Matthews + Esther Spravzoff61049% games−0.5% vs expected
Ann Harwood + Esther Spravzoff8554% games−1.2% vs expected
Jana Perpich + Allison Bates2643% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Crownhart
192W–105L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Esther Spravzoff
63W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Allison Bates
47W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Helen McCallum
56W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Lynn Matthews
46W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Gwen Schulz
48W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Leanne Mariano
52W–66L career · 5 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
3.5
Ann Harwood
66W–94L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Debra Mourtsen
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jana Perpich
29W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Palley
21W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam DEDINSKY
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Schweitzer
16W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.