Teams

SD LT Peninsula TC/ McLean

2026 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

17 players · average NTRP 3.59 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-30vs SD LT Mtn View/ LimonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEve Sullivan / Karen Nguyen vs Sara Fairbank / Guadalupe Garcia6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRebecca McKinley / Yekaterina Smotrich vs Yasuko Stanley / Gina White3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-23vs SD LT SDTRC/ AdamsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAngelie Hoang / Angela Christian vs Jennifer Austin / Marva Gesell1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-16vs SD LT Balboa TC/ GyureWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngelie Hoang / Shelby Carlin vs Candace Gyure / Jennifer Neivert7-6, 6-1
2026-08-09vs SD LT SDTRC/ JacksonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarissa Slavinsky / Angelie Hoang vs Irene Coppedge / Nana Matoba6-2, 6-3
2026-08-02vs SD LT SDTRC/ AdamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrace Ogihara / Karen Nguyen vs Katerina Govoni / Susan Faltico6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarissa Slavinsky / Amy Wang vs Jennifer Austin / Marina Tomczak6-4, 6-2
2026-07-26vs SD LT Mtn View/ LimonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Christian / Rebecca McKinley vs Victoria Cartwright / Michelle Mendoza6-4, 6-4
2026-07-17vs SD LT SDTRC/ JacksonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Carr / Karen Nguyen vs Gladys Esponda / Jennie Blacker6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShelby Carlin / Amy Wang vs Courtney Zeidan / Nana Matoba7-6, 6-2
2026-06-28vs SD LT Balboa TC/ GyureWon 20
W#1 DoublesEve Sullivan / Julia Carr vs Kanoko Esheim / Becky Yzaguirre6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShelby Carlin / Angela Christian vs Whitney Johnson / Candace Gyure6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LT Peninsula TC/ McLean50150395
2SDNC LT Rancho Valencia/ Meyer53131127231
3SD LT Balboa TC/ Gyure329618146
4SD LT SDTRC/ Jackson3481330222
5SD LT Mtn View/ Limon043919131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Claire Mittermiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Grace Ogihara
published 4
3.81
Karen Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Catherine Sheils
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Kristine Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Eve Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
christine nishiyama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.62
Julia Carr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Dana Davalos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Yekaterina Smotrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Elizabeth McLean
published 3.5
3.32
Christine Pham
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Marissa Slavinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Shelby Carlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Angelie Hoang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Rebecca McKinley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Angela Christian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Mittermiller + Grace Ogihara15758% games+11.2% vs expected
Yekaterina Smotrich + christine nishiyama8067% games+9.2% vs expected
Yekaterina Smotrich + Dana Davalos4162% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Sheils + Dana Davalos213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Sheils + Claire Mittermiller303 matchesnot enough data
Yekaterina Smotrich + Kristine Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Dana Davalos + Grace Ogihara123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claire Mittermiller
81W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Grace Ogihara
69W–48L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Karen Nguyen
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Catherine Sheils
51W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Eve Sullivan
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
christine nishiyama
35W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.69
Julia Carr
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dana Davalos
90W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Yekaterina Smotrich
176W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Elizabeth McLean
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Christine Pham
9W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Marissa Slavinsky
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Shelby Carlin
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Angelie Hoang
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Rebecca McKinley
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Angela Christian
52W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.