Teams

Kiger

2025 Hampton Roads Singles · Hampton Roads Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-12vs NewtonWon 10
W#3 SinglesLauren Kiger vs Marcela Anongos6-3, 6-2
2025-12-01vs Kindley - Nice AcesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJen Lagow vs Jennifer Kindley6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKimberly Havener vs Liz Martin5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesCarrie Coleman vs Katie Donahue6-4, 7-6
2025-11-21vs NewtonWon 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Kiger vs Kathryn Fraim7-5, 7-5
2025-11-07vs Kindley - Nice AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Kiger vs Merin Shekitka6-4, 7-6
2025-10-31Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Kiger vs Rebecca Newton6-4, 7-5
2025-10-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Kiger vs Rebecca Newton6-2, 6-1
2025-10-17vs Kindley - Nice AcesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJen Lagow vs Ashley Jessee6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCarrie Coleman vs Ashley Holmes6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesAllison Lavigne vs Katie Donahue2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-06vs Kindley - Nice AcesLost 03
L#1 SinglesJen Lagow vs Ashley Jessee3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKimberly Havener vs Jennifer Kindley5-7, 6-7
L#3 SinglesAllison Lavigne vs Candace Munden2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Lauren Kiger
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
published
3.29
Carrie Coleman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Havener
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Allison Lavigne
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Jen Lagow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Kiger
79W–63L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
Rebecca Hoover
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carrie Coleman
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kimberly Havener
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Allison Lavigne
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jen Lagow
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.