Teams

2-SDNC 3.5 El Camino CC (2:2)/ Balbo

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Dyerly / Tina Riedell vs Kathleen Kleinfeld / Paula Brust6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTien Tran / Tina Riedell vs Amy Bailey / Alena Khoroshansky4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRosanna Balbo / Leslie Dyerly vs Kaprece Walker / Lynn Wagner4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesTien Tran / Tina Riedell vs Jenelle Aris / Berkley Bowers5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLeslie Dyerly vs Mary Ann Neder7-6, 2-6
2023-02-03vs 2-SDNC 3.5 RBS&TC (3:1)/ GerardiWon 10
W#1 DoublesTien Tran / Leslie Dyerly vs Kelly Murphy / Nancy Samuelsen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTien Tran / Tina Riedell vs Jennifer Benshoof / Donna Granholm7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLeslie Dyerly / Patricia Papciak vs Trish Geary / Nicole Holliday2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesTien Tran / Tina Riedell vs Molly Tanner / LJ Nicholas6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Papciak / Leslie Dyerly vs Maritia Walper / Holly Carter6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLeslie Dyerly / Tien Tran vs Beth Piper / Nancy Sexton6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTina Riedell vs Audra Markman1-6, 1-6
2023-01-06vs 2-SDNC 3.5 La Costa (2:2)/ ZielinskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTien Tran / Tina Riedell vs Jennifer Kriech / Laura Kieffer6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSara Gil / Leslie Dyerly vs Amy Lass / Diana Blake6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jennifer Gilstrap
published
3.30
Tina Riedell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Leslie Dyerly
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Sara Gil
published
3.13
Alicia Moran
published 3.5
2.93
Rosanna Balbo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Riedell + Leslie Dyerly6548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gilstrap
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Tina Riedell
56W–86L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Leslie Dyerly
58W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Sara Gil
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Alicia Moran
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Rosanna Balbo
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.