Teams

Moore-Roach 40s 7.5 Combo W Sunday

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-06vs Ray 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Roach / Rosa Phillips vs Mimi Cartee / Jacqueline Bell7-5, 7-6
2024-09-29vs Kasik 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Moore / Susan Roach vs Heidi Gingerich / Kathryn Egerton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-15vs Ray 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeann Spencer / Susan Roach vs Yukari Matsuoka / Jacqueline Bell4-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs Ray 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJill Moore / Susan Roach vs Debbie Clancy / Jacqueline Bell6-0, 6-1
2024-08-11vs Kasik 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmmy Biaggi / Susan Roach vs Tonya Lomas / Lesley Rossato6-4, 6-0
2024-08-04vs Kirby 40s 7.5 Combo W SundayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Moore / Susan Roach vs Ginger Hayworth / Leanne Rosenbower6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Christine Hinch
published 4
3.61
Layne King
published
3.61
Julia Fresina
published
3.60
Emmy Biaggi
published
3.56
Julie Buchanan
published
3.54
Susan Roach
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.49
Kamron Moody
published
3.34
Rosa Phillips
published
3.32
Jessica Huellmantel
published
3.02
Mary Winstead
published
Leann Spencer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emmy Biaggi + Mary Winstead213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Hinch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Layne King
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Julia Fresina
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
Emmy Biaggi
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.60
Julie Buchanan
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Susan Roach
121W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
3.54
Kamron Moody
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
Rosa Phillips
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Jessica Huellmantel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
Leann Spencer
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.