Teams

Lou/Bean

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER INVITATIONAL · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Madge Dennis
published
3.77
Margaret Hoffman
published
3.69
Miriam Long
published
3.69
Eleanor Lyons
published 4
3.67
Janis Kern
published
3.44
Susan Mateja
published
3.43
Sarah McDade
published
3.15
Janie Bean
published
Nancy Donohue
published
Susan Habeeb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah McDade + Janie Bean3254% games−5.5% vs expected
Margaret Hoffman + Miriam Long303 matchesnot enough data
Madge Dennis + Miriam Long303 matchesnot enough data
Janie Bean + Miriam Long033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madge Dennis
43W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Margaret Hoffman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Miriam Long
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Eleanor Lyons
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Janis Kern
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Susan Mateja
15W–28L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
Sarah McDade
36W–32L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
Janie Bean
35W–42L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
Nancy Donohue
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Habeeb
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.