Teams

EFSC - Kiss My Ace

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-20vs Brevard/WolszczakLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Burns / Courtney Thomassen vs Julie Wolszczak / Missi DeMorat4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGisela Alcalde / Susan Douglas vs Julia Watters / Joni Smith7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-13vs EFSC - McLachlanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Criste / Courtney Thomassen vs Sara Hatfield / Kelly Sabel6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Douglas / Gisela Alcalde vs Edie Newell / Keiko Edwards3-6, 4-6
2026-04-29vs Brevard/WolszczakLost 12
W#1 SinglesMonika Bandi vs Melissa Johnson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Criste / Courtney Thomassen vs Debbie Sibley / Joni Smith4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Williams / Gisela Alcalde vs Maegan Hulscher / Terry Taylor3-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs EFSC - McLachlanLost 02
L#2 DoublesEmily Criste / Susan Douglas vs Sara Hatfield / Gaylyn Woodruff4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Williams / Emily Minot vs Stephanie Tran / Julie Cole0-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs Brevard/WolszczakLost 01
L#1 SinglesMonika Bandi vs Dawn Barlow1-6, 3-6
2026-04-01vs EFSC - McLachlanLost 01
L#3 DoublesAngie Williams / Emily Criste vs Edie Newell / Licci Barham3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Monika Bandi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Courtney Thomassen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Liz Donnelly
published
3.39
Amanda Burns
published 4
3.39
Gisela Alcalde
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.38
Angie Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Emily Minot
published
3.14
Emily Criste
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Maite Harte
published
Miranda Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Criste + Courtney Thomassen6354% games+13.2% vs expected
Monika Bandi + Courtney Thomassen123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Criste + Amanda Burns033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Monika Bandi
45W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Liz Donnelly
52W–21L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Amanda Burns
0W–13L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
3.5
Gisela Alcalde
267W–176L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
4
Angie Williams
4W–13L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Emily Minot
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 11 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Maite Harte
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Miranda Jackson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.