Teams

ACAC- Davis Double Trouble Mix

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.61 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-30vs 7.0 Stephens Huguenot ParkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Curtis / Grace Kim vs Aric Mueller / Katherine Guerette7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEddie Kim / Joanne Wilson vs Benjamin Andrews / Kim Espasadin2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Wilson / Rebecca Cassilly vs Jeffrey Johnson / Megan Abel5-7, 4-6
2025-06-17vs Team Woodlake - CousineauLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / John Mulligan vs Dave McCoy / Julie Kratzer5-7, 3-6
2025-06-16vs WOCC Moehling Mix 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cassilly / Thomas Wilson vs Shawn Harwood / Farrell Harwood3-3
L#2 DoublesEric Carter / Carol Pfeiffer vs Bernly Bressler / Laura Vetter1-6, 3-6
2025-05-30vs Avalon Mier/BlandLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Pepple / Elizabeth Coleman vs Ryan Gibson / Toni O'Reilly1-6, 6-7
2025-05-24vs Avalon MizrachLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / John Mulligan vs Steven Edlavitch / Faith Kallman3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
David Knudson
published 4
3.77
Grace Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Eddie Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
John Mulligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Reginald Tabor
published
3.30
Jonathan Meade
published
3.24
Thomas Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Eric Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Ashley Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Aaron
published
Matt Pepple
published
Tucker Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Meade + Deanne Ralston123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Wilson + Carol Pfeiffer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Knudson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
John Mulligan
23W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Reginald Tabor
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jonathan Meade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Thomas Wilson
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
172W–119L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Eric Carter
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Ashley Curtis
47W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Pepple
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tucker Martin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.