Teams

HCC Lines WKEND

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-01vs Avalon-WagnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRaj Sabharwal / Stanton McComb vs Brian Parker / Jon Mullis2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ellis / Jr Joyce vs Edward Wagner / Andrew Treharne6-1, 6-2
2025-05-31vs Lakeside Club - KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Lines / Raj Sabharwal vs Alejandro King / Keary Shaub6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJr Joyce vs Joshua Bartels6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoel McClellan / Stanton McComb vs Mark Sperry / Jon Markham6-0, 6-5
2025-05-18vs Chestnut Oaks Rec- Mercurio 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesDouglas Lines / Joel McClellan vs Rao Bolli / Antonio Jones-Stamm6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Ellis vs William Allen6-3, 6-2
2025-05-09vs Burkwood 2.5 PowellLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Lines / Jr Joyce vs Andrew Powell / Brendon Albon7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoel McClellan vs Dylan Forlines2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStanton McComb / Christopher Ellis vs Charles Muncy / Scott Childs6-4, 7-5
2025-04-26vs ACAC NaputiLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Lines / Joel McClellan vs David Naputi / Jarrett Sweeney1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStanton McComb vs James Searles3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ellis / Raj Sabharwal vs Bradford Rhodes / Parker Ward7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Westwood WizSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDouglas Lines / Jr Joyce vs Kyle Strater / Stephen Demella7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRaj Sabharwal vs Patrick Regan1-6, 5-7
2025-04-06vs Beastie Balls - WalekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStanton McComb / Douglas Lines vs Christopher Flynn / Connor Rust3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJr Joyce vs Jake Bloom6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Jr Joyce
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.56
Christopher Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.54
Douglas Lines
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.51
Joel McClellan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Raj Sabharwal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stanton McComb
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jr Joyce
13W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Christopher Ellis
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · type A · 11 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Joel McClellan
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Raj Sabharwal
5W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stanton McComb
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.