Teams

GBeal (GCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-24Won 20
W#2 DoublesGary Covitz / Phillip Morgan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Shuman / MARK TERRIO vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-17vs RTeat (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGary Covitz / David Drossman vs Richard Teat / Steven Todd6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Shuman / MARK TERRIO vs Larry McCorkle / Jeff Allcock3-6, 2-6
2025-09-10vs RTeat (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMARK TERRIO / Gary Covitz vs Allen Ramsey / Chin Lin7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-02vs RTeat (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGiles Beal / Gary Covitz vs Tom Traub / David Bowman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs RTeat (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesZachary Stroupe / MARK TERRIO vs Kevin Seasely / Allen Ramsey6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-20vs RTeat (WSRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Davis / David Drossman vs Tom Traub / David Bowman1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJohn Lineberger / Walter Fournet vs Larry McCorkle / Steven Todd3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErik Witten / David Shuman vs Eric Martin / Chin Lin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Zachary Stroupe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Erik Witten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Gary Covitz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.63
MARK TERRIO
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Giles Beal
published
3.20
David Drossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Walter Fournet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Lineberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phillip Morgan
published
Spurgeon Mackie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Zachary Stroupe
105W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Erik Witten
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
3.5
Gary Covitz
38W–22L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.74
3.5
MARK TERRIO
126W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Giles Beal
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
David Drossman
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Walter Fournet
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
John Lineberger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Morgan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Spurgeon Mackie
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.