Teams

SRC - Otto

2026 Volusia Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-07vs FTC - CoskerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Chalmers / Donna Otto vs Robin Cosker / Sirikit Press3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTamara Watkins / Mary Sugrue vs Mary Ferrari / Diane Castelli4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-28vs FTC - CoskerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Smiechewicz / Jorika Steyn vs Mary Ferrari / Diane Castelli1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Otto / Michelle Chalmers vs Katy Rachman / Jodi Manning4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Watkins / Mary Sugrue vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-21vs FTC - CoskerWon 30
W#1 DoublesReiko Walls / Michelle Chalmers vs Kristen Okarski / Jodi Manning2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Malave / Jorika Steyn vs Robin Cosker / Martha Tomory3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Nicklaus / Candace Newman vs Sirikit Press / Katy Rachman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-07vs FTC - CoskerWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Nicklaus / Candace Newman vs Terri Lindsay / Diane Castelli6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Malave / Mary Sugrue vs Robin Cosker / Kristen Okarski6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Gardner / Jorika Steyn vs Jodi Manning / Kristi Rice6-3, 6-1
2026-01-31vs FTC - CoskerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Malave / Tamara Watkins vs Kristi Rice / Katy Rachman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJorika Steyn / Mary Sugrue vs Kristen Okarski / Sirikit Press6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Nicklaus / Reiko Walls vs Robin Cosker / Martha Tomory3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-24vs FTC - CoskerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Sugrue / Amy Malave vs Mary Ferrari / Diane Castelli7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJorika Steyn / Nancy Gardner vs Martha Tomory / Kristen Okarski6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Nicklaus / Candace Newman vs Terri Lindsay / Jodi Manning7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Deborah Nicklaus
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.77
Amy Malave
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Tamara Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Rhonda Smiechewicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Candace Newman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donna Otto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jorika Steyn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Sugrue
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Chalmers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Reiko Walls
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Watkins + Amy Malave5058% gamesnot enough data
Candace Newman + Deborah Nicklaus303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Nicklaus
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
4
Amy Malave
50W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Tamara Watkins
45W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Rhonda Smiechewicz
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Candace Newman
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10
Donna Otto
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorika Steyn
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Sugrue
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Chalmers
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Gardner
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Reiko Walls
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.