Teams

Double the Fun

Adult 55 & Over Summer · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-24vs JailbirdsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaurie Rodgers / Judy Weinstein vs Sherri Ilgner / Therese West4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Deasey / Joye Shrager vs Martha Olson / Penny Link3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-18vs The Mighty DucsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Schonberger / Bari Krein vs Sandy Whiteside / Betsy Woodrow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Deasey / Laurie Rodgers vs Robin DeRogatis / Lynn Wildrick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Grossman / Pamela Lederer vs Pamela Smyth / Carole Sue Remley6-0, 6-0
2022-08-11vs Wild HourSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Schonberger / Bari Krein vs Pattie Heidengren / Marcia Hiehle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoye Shrager / Mary Deasey vs Lois Bartolomei / Trish Sheff3-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs Love ShotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBari Krein / Joye Shrager vs Jill Cohen / Lynn Selhat2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarion Hanuschek / Judy Weinstein vs Judy Christis / Judy Horrocks1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Deasey / Joan Laleike vs Debra Pincar / Karen Reaume0-6, 0-6
2022-07-21vs Summer ShotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoye Shrager / Marion Hanuschek vs Stephanie Rossino / Amy Carlino3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Weinstein / Mary Deasey vs Maureen Gillespie / Donna Mill6-3, 4-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Baldwin / Joan Laleike vs Kimberly Beebe / Darlene Flores2-6, 3-6
2022-07-14vs Y NotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesBari Krein / Beth Schonberger vs Betty Angelucci / Heather Sharpe4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Lederer / Laurie Rodgers vs Marsha Faass / Danielle Hughes6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Sassoli / Judy Weinstein vs Virginia Burke / Daniela Leone6-1, 7-5
2022-07-08vs Mood SwingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Schonberger / Bari Krein vs Amy Clark / Michele Campbell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Lederer / Lisa Grossman vs Lauren O'Neil / Mary Ostoich6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoye Shrager / Patricia Sassoli vs Danielle Lombardo / Lisa Mambuca6-1, 6-3
2022-06-30vs HPTA - Love AllLost 03
L#1 DoublesBari Krein / Beth Schonberger vs Devany Penne / Emily Morgan5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Sassoli / Judy Weinstein vs Noelle Lachenmayer / Lauren Katz6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Deasey / Marion Hanuschek vs Anat Greener / Jill Schain2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Beth Schonberger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Lisa Grossman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Patricia Sassoli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Bari Krein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Laurie Rodgers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Theresa Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Judy Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.02
Joye Shrager
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Joan Laleike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marion Hanuschek
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Lederer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Rodgers + Pamela Lederer10361% games+10.6% vs expected
Lisa Grossman + Pamela Lederer13563% games+7.9% vs expected
Patricia Sassoli + Joye Shrager3251% games+6.2% vs expected
Beth Schonberger + Bari Krein232351% games−1.1% vs expected
Bari Krein + Joye Shrager4448% games−3.2% vs expected
Joan Laleike + Theresa Baldwin123143% games−4.1% vs expected
Beth Schonberger + Joye Shrager2354% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Sassoli + Judy Weinstein3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Schonberger
74W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Lisa Grossman
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Patricia Sassoli
117W–122L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Bari Krein
40W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Laurie Rodgers
41W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Theresa Baldwin
61W–63L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Judy Weinstein
34W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Joye Shrager
36W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Joan Laleike
18W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Marion Hanuschek
35W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Lederer
25W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.