Teams

J.Pershke

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-07vs J.Cannon CCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMichael McGuire vs John Taylor6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Durland / Patrick Smith vs Jeffrey Nottingham / Paxton Badham0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJon Pershke / David Hodl vs Joel Miles / David Holdstock2-6, 5-7
2023-04-23vs T.Muncie 4.0 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesBill Francis / Michael McGuire vs Jeffrey Kopf / Scott Anderson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Durland / Patrick Smith vs Michael Gallagher / Ken Glanville6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-19vs G.JimenezLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Durland / Michael McGuire vs Carlos Collado / Brandon Keisner6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Hodl / Brian Howell vs Brian Rigney / John Parsons3-6, 0-6
2023-04-16vs D.TranLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael McGuire vs Gordon Paulson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Hodl / Brian Howell vs Linh Nguyen / Charles Whitehorne2-6, 1-6
2023-03-24vs M.JamesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMichael McGuire vs Tevin Wilson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKeith Satisky / William Durland vs Nicholas Baxendell / Nick Doyle6-1, 6-3
2023-03-19vs I.Pataki 18+ 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / Bill Francis vs Mark Stephenson / Edward Farley6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeith Satisky / William Durland vs Thomas Stieber / Michael Hamlett6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Michael McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Charles George
published 4
3.87
Chris Mann
published 4
3.79
Bill Francis
published 4
3.76
William Durland
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Thomas Bell
published
3.32
Brian Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
David Hodl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jason Pendse
published
Keith Satisky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Durland + Michael McGuire224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael McGuire
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Charles George
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Chris Mann
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Bill Francis
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
William Durland
45W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Thomas Bell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brian Howell
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Hodl
47W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Jason Pendse
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith Satisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.