Teams

CCC MOROW

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-18vs CCC KNUCKLEYLost 12
W#1 DoublesVanessa Jordan / Madison Rodewald vs Victoria Morris / Jessica Bookout6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMary Brezik vs Allison Westmoreland3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Pate / Brittany Voxland vs Blaine Parkey / Tamara Thompson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-31vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Drumm / Brittany Voxland vs Kayli Conrad / Tia McBrien6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmanda Morow vs Shannon Morgan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Rico / Vanessa Jordan vs Erica Mulcahy / Brandy Oetman4-6, 5-7
2025-03-07vs TCU MEYER/THOMASWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Rodewald / Amanda Morow vs Courtney Meyer / Taylor Teagarden6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrittany Rico vs Kelsey Wilkins6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKasey Johnston / Samantha Drumm vs Natalie Reay / Monica Jones6-2, 6-3
2025-02-28vs SO JENNINGS/VOIGTWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Drumm / Brittany Rico vs Denise Semple / Kelley Burt6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Morow vs Amanda Peterson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKasey Johnston / Vanessa Jordan vs Linda Lawrence / Katie Forman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Amanda Morow
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer Hurd
published
2.55
Brittany Rico
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.50
Samantha Drumm
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.39
Kasey Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Vanessa Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Brittany Voxland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.99
Lindsay Pate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Rodewald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Brezik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Morow + Brittany Rico2451% games+17.0% vs expected
Kasey Johnston + Vanessa Jordan1432% games−6.9% vs expected
Samantha Drumm + Kasey Johnston224 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Rico + Vanessa Jordan044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Morow
17W–15L career · 10 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Jennifer Hurd
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Brittany Rico
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Samantha Drumm
9W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kasey Johnston
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Vanessa Jordan
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.38
2.5
Brittany Voxland
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Lindsay Pate
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Madison Rodewald
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Brezik
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.