Teams

Pettis, Elizabeth

2025 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs King, ChaseLost 03
L#1 SinglesCatherine Pettis Rule vs Danielle David7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohnna Valentine / Clara Hammett vs Ashley Smith / Paige Porter2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Pettis vs Ariana Palacios4-6, 3-6
2025-03-17vs Smith, AutumnLost 05
L#1 DoublesChristian Fortenberry / Hayley Brown vs Lina Rincon / Brittany Myers3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarianna Redd vs Elizabeth Randall0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Pettis Rule / Elizabeth Pettis vs Liza Mounger / Kathrynrose Kidd6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesColby Jordan vs Melissa Holy0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHallye Lewis / Clara Hammett vs Ginny Bowden / Erica Stutzman1-6, 0-6
2025-03-03vs May, BriLost 05
L#1 DoublesKelsey Jones / Valerie Prado vs Leigh Anne Coleman / Martha Maxey3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesColby Jordan vs Brandi Hyatt1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCosby Parker / Clara Hammett vs Elizabeth May / Molly Blakeney4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTammie Stringer vs Caroline King Haynes0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeanie Malouf / Johnna Valentine vs Lindsey Shukla / Laurie Mohon2-6, 3-6
2025-02-24vs Turpin, LeahbethLost 14
L#1 DoublesChristian Fortenberry / Hayley Brown vs Jeanna Crowder / Kristin Hardy4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCatherine Pettis Rule vs Leahbeth Turpin5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohnna Valentine / Valerie Prado vs Mary Wilsford Hodges / Natalie Hutto4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Pettis vs Meredith Womack6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJeanie Malouf / Tammie Stringer vs Anna Carollo / Ashley Cole2-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs Resch, AllynWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelsey Jones / Catherine Pettis Rule vs Melissa Galbraith / Winky Newman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristian Fortenberry vs Allison Moore6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesColby Jordan / Cosby Parker vs Katie Bumgarner / Melody Boone1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Pettis vs Allyn Resch6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesClara Hammett / Johnna Valentine vs Angie McKissack / Juli-Ann Marquette4-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs Sullivan, AshleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesValerie Prado / Mary Holly Lott vs Tori Campbell / Stephanie McKnatt3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarianna Redd vs Ashley Sullivan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Pettis / Hallye Lewis vs Marissa Mucho / Virginia Britt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTammie Stringer / Jeanie Malouf vs Shelby Martin / Allison Sims2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1King, Chase71301024264
2May, Bri62271331280
3Thomas, Shelby34142146323
4Cooper, Stephany34122349338
5Ball, Conner Beth25191634294
6Black, Eason25122348341
7Turpin, Leahbeth26112960421
8Pettis, Elizabeth1552551316

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Catherine Pettis Rule
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christian Fortenberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.59
Marianna Redd
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Cosby Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Clara Hammett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Colby Jordan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.12
Johnna Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Pettis
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Hallye Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jeanie Malouf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Holly Lott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tammie Stringer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Valerie Prado
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Pettis Rule
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christian Fortenberry
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianna Redd
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
3
Cosby Parker
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Clara Hammett
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Colby Jordan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Johnna Valentine
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Elizabeth Pettis
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hallye Lewis
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanie Malouf
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Holly Lott
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tammie Stringer
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Prado
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.