Teams

SS-D BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-29vs GR SILVERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMichelle Brudigan vs EMILY JENNINGS6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Lori Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-22vs CCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Brudigan / Lori Lee vs Tonya Mazurek / Mikelle Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Nanci Cheberenchick vs Josephine Huelskamp / Patti Knepper7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShawna Allen / Kate Pulliam vs Ashley Ruger / Leah Sherwood3-6, 4-6
2023-05-15vs LEBTC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesKari Graham / Lori Lee vs Krista Krusz / Adriana Sosa6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShawna Allen / Michelle Brudigan vs Claudia Rohr / Becky Ammer6-3, 6-0
2023-05-08vs PH GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Linda Backus vs Tara Wolfe / Abigail Smith6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Brudigan / Anja Korhonen vs Amy Stettner / Jennifer Fahey2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-01vs BM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Lee / Kari Graham vs Kimberly Picchietti / Catherine Rollhaus7-6, 6-2
2023-04-24vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
W#2 SinglesMichelle Brudigan vs Rachel Osborne6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesShawna Allen / Kate Pulliam vs Monica Sheehy / Courtney Gocha4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-17vs KC-CC ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Graham / Debbie Sabato vs Gina Akins / Janie Ramseier6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Michelle Brudigan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Shawna Allen
published
2.69
Kari Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Lori Lee
published
2.56
Debbie Sabato
published 3
2.40
Kate Pulliam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Linda Backus
published
Marjery Clark
published
Nanci Cheberenchick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Graham + Lori Lee8455% games+8.2% vs expected
Kate Pulliam + Shawna Allen2645% games+1.6% vs expected
Marjery Clark + Nanci Cheberenchick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michelle Brudigan
47W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Shawna Allen
16W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Kari Graham
95W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Lori Lee
35W–25L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Debbie Sabato
8W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Kate Pulliam
94W–67L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
Linda Backus
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marjery Clark
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nanci Cheberenchick
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.