Teams

YTC-DeGrasse

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-10vs SC-GrinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesGena Franklin / Justin Wright vs Annelise Anderson / David Robin0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Andrew Hyink vs Dewey Kim / Anna Raschko6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJodi Landefeld / Jim Stewart vs Tom Griner / Jenny Adams4-6, 4-6
2021-10-10vs SC-GrinerLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacy Stephen / Tyler van Horn vs Tom Griner / Annelise Anderson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Don Ballew vs David Robin / Anna Raschko2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGena Franklin / Andrew Hyink vs Jenny Adams / Dewey Kim4-6, 3-6
2021-10-09vs SC-GrinerLost 03
L#1 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Justin Wright vs Tom Griner / Jenny Adams7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJodi Landefeld / Jim Stewart vs Annelise Anderson / Dewey Kim2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChrissy Morgan / Don Ballew vs David Robin / Kathleen Burns3-6, 3-6
2021-10-09vs SC-GrinerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJodi Landefeld / Andrew Hyink vs Tom Griner / Annelise Anderson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChrissy Morgan / Don Ballew vs David Robin / Jenny Adams2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStacy Stephen / Tyler van Horn vs Dewey Kim / Kathleen Burns2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Tyler van Horn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Gena Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Andrew Hyink
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Don Ballew
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Justin Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.69
Jim Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Stacy Stephen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.01
Chrissy Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jodi Landefeld
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Ballew + Chrissy Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Hyink + Gena Franklin033 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + Stacy Stephen213 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Degrasse + Don Ballew123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tyler van Horn
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Gena Franklin
51W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrew Hyink
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Don Ballew
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Justin Wright
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jim Stewart
32W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Stacy Stephen
70W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
4.5
Chrissy Morgan
29W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.01
0
Jodi Landefeld
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.