Teams

Walton

2026 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W Adult 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-25vs BellLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hodges / Jeanne Ware vs Lena Juarez / Jennifer Slocum4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Barrow vs Jennie Merchant2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel England / Katie Walton vs Michelle Winokur / Shelly Bell4-6, 5-7
2026-06-18vs BellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanne Ware / Ruby Williams vs Sarah Kosberg / Cyndi Knox6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKatie Walton vs Jennie Merchant6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRaquel England / Kara Hackney vs Shelly Bell / Marla Vickers0-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs BellWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeanne Ware / Stephanie Hodges vs Michelle Winokur / Jennifer Slocum4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRuby Williams vs Cyndi Knox6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Barrow / Diana Allee vs Shelly Bell / Sarah Kosberg6-4, 7-5
2026-06-04vs BellLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatie Walton vs Michelle Winokur5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel England / Kara Hackney vs Marla Vickers / Jennie Merchant3-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs BellWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Jeanne Ware vs Sarah Kosberg / Lucy Clay Mcgehee7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Walton vs Jennie Merchant2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRaquel England / Kara Hackney vs Jennifer Slocum / Cyndi Knox3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs BellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanne Ware / Diana Allee vs Marla Vickers / Jennie Merchant7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRuby Williams vs Cyndi Knox6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Emily Barrow vs Jennifer Slocum / Shelly Bell6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs BellWon 21
W#1 DoublesRuby Williams / Stephanie Hodges vs Lucy Clay Mcgehee / Jennifer Slocum6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Walton vs Jennie Merchant6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeemanshi Shah-lakshmin / Emily Barrow vs Sarah Kosberg / Cyndi Knox3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ruby Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.55
Katie Walton
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.54
Stephanie Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jeanne Ware
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Emily Barrow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.41
Raquel England
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Diana Allee
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Andrea Friall
published 2.5
2.17
Kara Hackney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Hodges + Jeanne Ware2350% gamesnot enough data
Raquel England + Kara Hackney123 matchesnot enough data
Emily Barrow + Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruby Williams
10W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.95
Katie Walton
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.55
Stephanie Hodges
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Jeanne Ware
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Emily Barrow
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Raquel England
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Diana Allee
33W–62L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Heemanshi Shah-lakshmin
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Andrea Friall
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Kara Hackney
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.