Teams

C 6.5W PW3 Thompson

2025 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-07vs C 6.5W MV2 WuLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Kristen Barnett vs Gwen Anderson / Janice Schmitt5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Maloney / Diane Blesi vs Therese Cunningham / Christine Olenik1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Free / Anjela Hindman vs Min Cui / Yuping Wu5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-10-26vs C 6.5W WR MollisonWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Koehler / Susan Whelan vs Delores Schwan / Beth Greenwood5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Romero / Sherry Rohweder vs Julie Kolar / Michelle Schenker6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJessica Merugu / Anjela Hindman vs Hilary Thomas / Teri Mollison6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-03vs C 6.5W MV2 WuWon 21
W#1 DoublesMona Thompson / Lindsay Dieterich vs Janice Schmitt / Therese Cunningham6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Rohweder / Diane Blesi vs Emily Lin / Kate Lawson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn Maloney / Amy Romero vs Tao You / MEI LI4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-19vs C 6.5W WR MollisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Dieterich / Kristen Barnett vs Shachi Mody / Teri Mollison6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Free / Anjela Hindman vs Hilary Thomas / Beth Greenwood3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Sawtelle / Mona Thompson vs Olga Khrenova / Kate Gottardi6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Katie Sawtelle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Lindsay Dieterich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Katelyn Houlas
published
Cindy Malixi
published 3.5
3.12
Nancy Koehler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Sherry Rohweder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Mona Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Kristen Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Anjela Hindman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Ann Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Amy Romero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Kajal Herman
published
2.86
Susan Whelan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Diane Blesi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Jessica Merugu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Amy Free
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Laurie Debenham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Thompson + Katie Sawtelle8078% games+16.3% vs expected
Ann Maloney + Sherry Rohweder3542% games−12.9% vs expected
Anjela Hindman + Lindsay Dieterich8266% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Merugu + Kajal Herman4349% gamesnot enough data
Ann Maloney + Diane Blesi314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Koehler + Diane Blesi314 matchesnot enough data
Diane Blesi + Anjela Hindman213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Barnett + Amy Free213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Sawtelle
23W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Lindsay Dieterich
63W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Katelyn Houlas
43W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cindy Malixi
6W–17L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Koehler
56W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Sherry Rohweder
71W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Mona Thompson
38W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Kristen Barnett
52W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3.5
Anjela Hindman
64W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Ann Maloney
38W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Amy Romero
20W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kajal Herman
37W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Susan Whelan
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Diane Blesi
179W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Jessica Merugu
34W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Amy Free
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Laurie Debenham
72W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.