Teams

CC Paso Perry 4.0W

2025 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 4.0W 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-29vs CC SLOCC Ricci 4.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Leane Masterson vs Patty Flores / Laura Winkenbach6-4, 6-2
2025-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Terri Wilson vs Catherine Pruett / Sheryl Brigham2-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs CC - LLW - Central Coast Sins 4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarcia Stebbens / Jennifer Chambers vs Cindy Kullman / Claudia Westrum4-6, 3-6
2025-06-01vs CC SLOCC Ricci 4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnji Perry / Jennifer Chambers vs Maggie Woodward / Dede Bodnar7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesTyler Bunderson vs Nicole Nicholson6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Hunter / Kathleen Thomas vs Masha Schroeder / Robyn Flores4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKristine Hunter / Tammy Lawson vs Lisa Corrente / Shannon Dossa6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-16vs CC SLOCC Ricci 4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Wilson / Darcia Stebbens vs Kristin Newsom / Robyn Flores5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-04vs CC SLOCC Ricci 4.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnji Perry / Tammy Lawson vs Patty Flores / Masha Schroeder6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCatherine Halsey vs Laura Winkenbach1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Chambers / Kristine Hunter vs Camila Strong / Hanna Smith1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 4.0W 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Darcia Stebbens
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Anji Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Zoe Cate
published
3.57
Kristine Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine Halsey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Tammy Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Gretel Crum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kathleen Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leane Masterson
published
Tyler Bunderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anji Perry + Darcia Stebbens5063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcia Stebbens
86W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Anji Perry
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Zoe Cate
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Kristine Hunter
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Catherine Halsey
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Lawson
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Gretel Crum
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kathleen Thomas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leane Masterson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Bunderson
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.