Teams

HG Gang Green - E. Collins

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-06vs Just Buck(horn) It - J. TorresWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cotey / Thor Moody vs Enrique Escobar / Raymond Jozwiak6-4, 6-4
2024-03-09vs West Meadows - C. KarkourWon 10
W#2 DoublesThor Moody / John Cotey vs Dan Crawford / Sriram Swaminathan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-02vs SVB - T. Vande BergLost 01
L#1 DoublesThor Moody / John Cotey vs Jeffrey Axen / Fernando Defaz1-6, 3-6
2024-02-24vs Saddlebrook - L. BarbettaLost 01
L#2 DoublesEddie Collins / Thor Moody vs Good Oh / Vijay Balagopala5-7, 2-6
2024-01-20vs Florida/Orsini/18&Over4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Bitting / Thor Moody vs NICHOLAS INNISS / Ken Jackson1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Erik Hajek
published
3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.71
Thor Moody
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Michael Bitting
published
3.67
Timothy Carr
published
3.63
Eddie Collins
published
3.41
Doug Angelone
published
3.24
George Pierce
published
John Cotey
published
John Slatniske
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Hajek + Eddie Collins2351% games−0.4% vs expected
John Cotey + Doug Angelone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erik Hajek
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Michael Bitting
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Timothy Carr
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.67
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Patrick Randrianarison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
George Pierce
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Slatniske
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.