Teams

LI: Carefree, Bacey/Bonadonna

2026 Tri Level Women 5.0 · 5.0,4.5,4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.30 / LONG ISLAND REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-26vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Perri / Deirdre Ettus vs Renee Lemmerman / Maya Tribble6-7, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAntonella Karlin / Huan Zhou vs Morgan Milleisen / Serena Rappa6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshley Freger / Marsha Silverman vs Merri Laffitte / Misha Monticciolo2-6, 6-4
2026-04-19vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Sarah Bowen vs Onalee Batcheller / Gabrielle Vaillant6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSondra Glueck / Kristen Cassidy vs Gina Hagedorn / Jacqueline Clark6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Huan Zhou vs Renee Lemmerman / Maya Tribble3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoanne Persico / Sondra Glueck vs Serena Rappa / Brooke Delprete6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Bonadonna / Marsha Silverman vs Frances Buckley / Misha Monticciolo2-6, 5-6
2026-03-15vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerWon 20
W#2 DoublesAntonella Karlin / Regan Abrams vs Serena Rappa / Gina Hagedorn6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarsha Silverman / Ashley Freger vs Carolyn Mellen / Merri Laffitte6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-15vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Sarah Bowen vs Onalee Batcheller / Gabrielle Vaillant6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAntonella Karlin / Huan Zhou vs Diann Starcke / Gina Hagedorn6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Soper / Devon Carroll vs Merri Laffitte / Troy Holt4-6, 5-7
2026-02-08vs Kings Park, Starcke/BatchellerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeirdre Ettus / Samantha Perri vs Onalee Batcheller / Gabrielle Vaillant6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAntonella Karlin / Regan Abrams vs Maya Tribble / Brooke Delprete6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Gershon / Ashley Freger vs Jillian Butta / Carolyn Mellen3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0,4.5,4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Sarah Bowen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.57
Deirdre Ettus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
Antonella Karlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Sondra Glueck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Huan Zhou
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Joanne Persico
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Jennifer Soper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Kristen Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Kimberly Gershon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Ashley Freger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Devon Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Marsha Silverman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Alyssa Bonadonna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nancy Turnblacer
published
Regan Abrams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Perri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bacey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonella Karlin + Huan Zhou16068% games+10.3% vs expected
Sondra Glueck + Kristen Cassidy3358% games+3.0% vs expected
Sondra Glueck + Joanne Persico29758% games+2.5% vs expected
Kimberly Gershon + Ashley Freger12653% games+1.0% vs expected
Deirdre Ettus + Sarah Bowen6356% games+0.2% vs expected
Sondra Glueck + Antonella Karlin3254% games−5.9% vs expected
Alyssa Bonadonna + Devon Carroll4248% games−7.5% vs expected
Alyssa Bonadonna + Susan Bacey5943% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bowen
50W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Deirdre Ettus
29W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Antonella Karlin
153W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Sondra Glueck
182W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.38
4.5
Huan Zhou
125W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Joanne Persico
58W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Jennifer Soper
225W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
Kristen Cassidy
61W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Kimberly Gershon
98W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Ashley Freger
86W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Devon Carroll
106W–108L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Marsha Silverman
56W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Alyssa Bonadonna
128W–128L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Nancy Turnblacer
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Regan Abrams
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Perri
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bacey
55W–66L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.