Teams

Baker 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.5 Women Singles Tues AM

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMWon 20
W#1 SinglesOlivia Linthavong vs Claire Driscoll6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Heidi Gingerich6-3, 6-2
2025-07-08vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMelissa Baker vs Claire Driscoll6-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesLauren Varkey vs Reeves Rhoten3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-01vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMLost 02
L#2 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Julie Dover3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMelissa Baker vs Kimberly Salata6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-24vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesOlivia Linthavong vs Kimberly Salata7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJulie Herrick vs Julie Dover1-6, 0-6
2025-06-17vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Varkey vs Reeves Rhoten6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesOlivia Linthavong vs Heidi Gingerich6-1, 6-1
2025-06-10vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLauren Varkey vs Claire Driscoll6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLondon Kern vs Heidi Gingerich2-6, 0-6
2025-06-03vs Driscoll 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesLeslie Marus vs Morgan Qubein6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Singles Tues AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Leslie Marus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Olivia Linthavong
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.48
Melissa Baker
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.48
Lauren Varkey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.13
London Kern
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Julie Herrick
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Baker + Olivia Linthavong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Marus
66W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.07
Olivia Linthavong
40W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Melissa Baker
35W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lauren Varkey
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
London Kern
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Julie Herrick
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.