Teams

Deerlake (Angela Morgan)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-01-04vs Seven Oaks (Christine Caraibot)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesLaura Bantug / Linda Bradford vs Mary Grieser / Andrea Bixler6-2, 6-7, 6-3
W#1 SinglesVanessa Mattesich vs Christine Caraibot6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichele Wolfe / Candice Dobra vs Patti White / Sunila Deshpande0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSara Zywicki / Greer Chapman vs Lori McDaniel / Jolie Steppe6-2, 7-5
W#4 DoublesTrisha Dooley / Allie Morgan vs Karenjit Mayer / Vaishali Jadhav6-4, 2-6, 7-5
2024-12-14vs Cambridge (Bridget Van Dyke)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesSara Zywicki / Linda Bradford vs Julia Stephen / Elle Race0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Mattesich vs Tiffany Coyle4-6, 6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCandice Dobra / Jaeiza Smith vs Iulia Harper / Bridget van Dyke2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Bantug / Angela Morgan vs Heather Bray / Linda Chang7-5, 2-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesTrisha Dooley / Allie Morgan vs Kim Erickson / Geri Underwood1-6, 3-6
2024-12-07vs Foxdale (Michelle Nesser)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesLaura Bantug / Julie Johnson vs Michelle Neser / Georgia Caras7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesVanessa Mattesich vs Analy Hernandez6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Bradford / Ashley Nguyen vs Mary Lynn Fleck / Lori Hennessey4-6, 6-3, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Morgan / Ann Cha vs Viv Davis / Engel Gesite6-2, 3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesCandice Dobra / Trisha Dooley vs Brittney Neser / Karen Chang2-6, 4-6
2024-11-23vs Mill Creek HS (Leslie Hooper)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJulie Johnson / Laura Bantug vs Natalie Cranford / Madison Shewbert0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJaeiza Smith vs Jennifer Bombulie3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Morgan / Greer Chapman vs Gemma Cerdan / Karen Zaro1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Zywicki / Ann Cha vs Anna Crockett / Marita Edrosa1-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesVanessa Mattesich / Ashley Nguyen vs Shayna Aspinwall / Leslie Hooper2-6, 7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Vanessa Mattesich
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published
3.77
Laura Bantug
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Linda Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Ashley Nguyen
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.54
Jaeiza Smith
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Stacy Mole
published
3.49
Ann Cha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Candice Dobra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Greer Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Sara Zywicki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Trisha Dooley
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Angela Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allie Morgan
published 3.5
Kaya Dopfer
published
Michele Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Bantug + Sara Zywicki8070% games+15.0% vs expected
Greer Chapman + Angela Morgan6352% games+4.6% vs expected
Laura Bantug + Angela Morgan2545% games+1.8% vs expected
Candice Dobra + Trisha Dooley3350% gamesnot enough data
Ann Cha + Stacy Mole314 matchesnot enough data
Ann Cha + Greer Chapman404 matchesnot enough data
Candice Dobra + Angela Morgan404 matchesnot enough data
Ann Cha + Sara Zywicki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vanessa Mattesich
57W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Laura Bantug
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Linda Bradford
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Ashley Nguyen
11W–1L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
Jaeiza Smith
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Stacy Mole
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Ann Cha
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Candice Dobra
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Greer Chapman
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Sara Zywicki
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Trisha Dooley
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Angela Morgan
38W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Allie Morgan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kaya Dopfer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Wolfe
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.