Teams

Ku.Holmberg18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-04vs Mi.Ratliff18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Pullara / Chris Pinkus vs Charles Gowland / Noah Yao1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoey Post / Steve Griffin vs Michael Ratliff / Todd Sprouse1-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs Sh.Roberts18ALost 02
L#2 SinglesTom Pullara vs Linwood White IV0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Holmberg / Joey Post vs Joseph Hollingsworth / Hanzhang Liu2-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs An.Womack18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Pullara / Kurt Holmberg vs Anthony Thomas / Kevin Manweiler0-6, 3-6
2025-04-06vs La.Williams18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Pullara / Chris Pinkus vs Kelsey Nix / James Vandenbossche6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-30vs Co.Sutler18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesGARY WALLACE / Tom Pullara vs Kevin Hampton / Jason McGeorge1-6, 2-6
2025-03-27vs Ro.Brown18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Klimko / Joey Post vs John Markham / Andy Schrader1-6, 0-6
2025-03-23vs Sh.Lav18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJoey Post / Steve Griffin vs Graham Wright / Jeff Abercrombie2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTom Pullara vs James Coblentz2-6, 2-6
2025-03-09vs Jo.Hastings18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJoey Post / Stephen Klimko vs Chris Nystrom / Patrick Webb1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTom Pullara / Kurt Holmberg vs John Hood / Gary Fye3-6, 1-6
2025-03-02vs To.Orban18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesGARY WALLACE / Tom Pullara vs Myles Grady / Jason Jin2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJoey Post / Bert Clancey vs Joseph Cockrell / Ryan Maloney4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connor Beckerle
published 3.5
3.09
Bert Clancey
published 3.5
2.98
Leo Reece
published
2.94
Tom Pullara
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
GARY WALLACE
published
2.72
Joey Post
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Russell VanBlon
published
Steve Griffin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bert Clancey + Leo Reece123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connor Beckerle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bert Clancey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Leo Reece
20W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Tom Pullara
67W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
GARY WALLACE
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Joey Post
32W–40L career · 12 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Russell VanBlon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Griffin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.