Teams

4S: The Wild Cards: Conklin

2026 2.5 Non-Advancing Tri-Level · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT 2.5 Racquettes Tri-Level: Vaccaro/Buschauer000000
24S: The Wild Cards: Conklin000000
3TRC: Donnelly000000
4TCT: Rosenfield000000
5WRC: Grandslammers 1000000
6WRC: Grandslammers 2000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
Nipa Urbanz
published
2.41
Kiersten Halstead
published
Ann Sheehy
published 2.5
2.21
Kathy Reale
published
2.03
Michele Conklin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nipa Urbanz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Kiersten Halstead
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Ann Sheehy
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Reale
18W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Michele Conklin
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.