Teams

Team 2 Sassy Smashers

2023 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over Fall · NOVA Tri Level Women 3.5, 3.0. 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMeg Harrington / Sally Bailey vs Laura McNicholl / Deborah Williams1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-12vs Team 3Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Yuan Zhang vs Kristen Brock / Maria Costea6-3, 6-5
2023-11-04vs Team 9 Capital CrushLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Hoyt / Sally Bailey vs Amber Surmiller / Caroline Ilse4-6, 4-5
2023-09-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Yuan Zhang vs Elisabeth Pearson / Courtney Simmons6-2, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level Women 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Yuan Zhang
published
3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.42
Genea Kennedy
published 3.5
3.28
Sally Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Melinda Capitano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Erika Hoyt
published 3.5
2.83
Indre Conners
published 3
2.74
Cindy Brault
published 3
2.70
Kim McCool
published
2.70
Julia Shin
published
2.68
Lina Saliba
published
2.56
Melissa Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Shin + Cindy Brault2342% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuan Zhang
48W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Genea Kennedy
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Sally Bailey
73W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Melinda Capitano
81W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Erika Hoyt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Brault
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Kim McCool
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Julia Shin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Lina Saliba
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Celeste Linthicum
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
Melissa Huang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.