Teams

AR 7.5M 55 & Over (Pautsch)

2025 Combo 55 & Over 7.5 · 7.5 Men (LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE)

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs Landis/Shaver/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Carr / Rickard Hood vs Daniel Lazenby / John Ramsay7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMax Garcia / Ed Rogers vs Lanny Landis / DOUG GOLDEN1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney vs Jon Erie / Roger Weldon6-0, 6-4
2025-11-09vs Landis/Shaver/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Rieger / Brent Jimenez vs Jonathan Johnson / Ryan Oyos6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMax Garcia / Paul Hurley vs Daniel Lazenby / DOUG GOLDEN2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney vs Jon Erie / John Ramsay6-1, 6-0
2025-11-08vs Landis/Shaver/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Carr / Rickard Hood vs Daniel Lazenby / David Newton3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRichard Branam / Andy Watkins vs Jonathan Johnson / Roger Weldon1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSean Mahoney / Kyden Reeh vs Lanny Landis / John Ramsay6-2, 6-3
2025-11-08vs Landis/Shaver/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrent Jimenez / Ryan Rieger vs Lanny Landis / DOUG GOLDEN2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMax Garcia / Ed Rogers vs Daniel Lazenby / David Newton7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney vs Joe Shaver / Ryan Oyos6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men (LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Kyden Reeh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Ryan Rieger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Brent Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Paul Pautsch
published
3.40
Rickard Hood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Richard Branam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Paul Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Andy Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ed Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Branam + Andy Watkins134 matchesnot enough data
Paul Hurley + Andy Watkins134 matchesnot enough data
Richard Branam + Kyden Reeh303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyden Reeh
30W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
Ryan Rieger
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Brent Jimenez
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Paul Pautsch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rickard Hood
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Richard Branam
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Paul Hurley
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Andy Watkins
15W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ed Rogers
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.